During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
"To do this in a highly competitive market, we must be efficient and agile in how we run our business.
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
“比如我正常应该是120kw充电，但只要车辆一多，就会明显下降，甚至只剩45kw。”小德坦言，不过好在数量多，每个服务区都有，充的频繁一些也可以满足需要。，推荐阅读搜狗输入法下载获取更多信息
5.78 x 2.78 x 0.28 inches，这一点在服务器推荐中也有详细论述